10.1k views
5 votes
An experiment that fails to include a control variable is poor science due to

1.individual moral
2.lack of replication
3.nothing to compare the results to
4.personal bias

User Umer Hayat
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

The correct answer is: 3. nothing to compare the results to.

Step-by-step explanation:

When conducting a scientific experiment, including a control variable is essential to establish a baseline or reference point for comparison. The control variable serves as a standard against which the results of the experimental variable are measured. Without a control variable, there is no basis for comparison, making it difficult to determine the effectiveness or impact of the experimental variable. This absence of a comparison undermines the validity and reliability of the experiment, resulting in poor scientific practice.

User Manoj Choudhari
by
7.5k points
4 votes

Answer:

Explanation:The experiment that fails to include a control variable is poor science due to "nothing to compare the results to".When conducting a scientific experiment, it is essential to have a control variable. The control variable is an element in an experiment that is held constant or unaltered. It provides a basis for comparison to measure the effect of the independent variable accurately. It helps to rule out other potential explanations for the results obtained.The lack of a control variable makes it difficult to determine whether the observed changes in the dependent variable were due to the independent variable or other factors. Therefore, it is crucial to include a control variable in scientific experiments.

User Yokogeri
by
8.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories