Answer:
It depends on the context of the problem and the interpretation of the ratio represented by the point (7, 8).
If we interpret the point (7, 8) as representing the ratio 7:8, then Adela's claim is incorrect. Adding the same number to both coordinates of the point would change the value of the ratio. For example, adding 1 to both coordinates would give the point (8, 9), which represents the ratio 8:9, which is not equivalent to 7:8.
However, if we interpret the point (7, 8) as representing a different type of ratio, such as the ratio of the distances from the point to two fixed points or the ratio of the areas of two shapes, then it may be possible to find an equivalent ratio by adding the same number to both coordinates of the point. In this case, Adela's claim could be correct.
Without more information about the context and interpretation of the ratio represented by the point (7, 8), it is difficult to determine the correctness of Adela's claim.