13.5k views
5 votes
How do low-mass and high-mass stars of the main sequence compare when it comes to

1. temperature?
b. Size?
c. Luminosity?
d. Lifetime?
e. Color?

User Mblw
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

High-mass main sequence stars are hotter, larger, and more luminous but live shorter lives than low-mass stars, which are cooler, smaller, less luminous, and have a longer lifespan. The color of these stars varies accordingly, with high mass stars appearing bluer and low mass stars appearing redder.

Step-by-step explanation:

When comparing low-mass and high-mass main sequence stars, several aspects should be considered: temperature, size, luminosity, lifetime, and color.

Temperature

High-mass stars are much hotter than low-mass stars. Consequently, high-mass stars appear blue in color, while low-mass stars appear red.

Size

High-mass stars are much larger than low-mass stars. This physical size difference is due to the amount of mass each star contains

Luminosity is greater in high-mass stars compared to low-mass stars, which means they shine more brightly.

The lifetime of a star is directly proportional to its mass and inversely proportional to its luminosity. Therefore, low-mass stars have longer lifetimes than high-mass stars, as they consume their fuel more slowly.

The color of a star is closely related to its surface temperature, with high-mass stars being bluer and low-mass stars being redder.

User Misha Zaslavsky
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.