Final answer:
The statement about hazing is true; it describes conduct causing suffering through activities that are cruel or oppressive without authority. Sexual harassment is separate but also a serious issue involving unwanted sexually-based behavior. Military training aims to foster discipline and camaraderie without emotional or physical harm.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement given in the question accurately defines the term hazing. Hazing is indeed any conduct in which a service member, without proper authority, intentionally or recklessly causes another service member to endure activities that are cruel, abusive, humiliating, oppressive, demeaning, or harmful.
This kind of behavior is detrimental to the morale and discipline within military forces and is taken very seriously.
In contrast, sexual harassment is a different, but also serious issue, and it's defined as sexually-based behavior that is knowingly unwanted and has an adverse effect on a person's employment status, interferes with a person's job performance, or creates a hostile or intimidating work environment.
Both hazing and sexual harassment have no place in any professional environment, including the military, where cohesion and mutual respect are critical for the functioning of the unit.
Part of the process of joining the military is going through a transformation where recruits are taught discipline and camaraderie through structured activities and training, but such activities should not be confused with hazing. Instead, they are designed to instill a new identity that aligns with military values and the expectations of the service without causing emotional or physical harm to the individuals.