102k views
0 votes
Opposition to the judiciary's creative policy making role is a consistent tenet of judicial

a. activism.
b. liberalism.
c. restraint.
d. conservatism.
e. relativism.

User ArtBindu
by
8.8k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The opposition to the judiciary's creative policy making role is a consistent tenet of judicial restraint, which refers to the belief that judges should defer to the elected branches of government and focus on a narrower interpretation of the Constitution.

Step-by-step explanation:

The opposition to the judiciary's creative policy making role is a consistent tenet of judicial restraint. Judicial restraint refers to the belief that judges should defer to the elected branches of government and focus on a narrower interpretation of the Constitution. Those who advocate for judicial restraint argue that policy decisions should be left to the legislative and executive branches. This stance is often associated with conservatism.

User Mohammed Aboelwafa
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.