Question

Modernization has resulted in the rapid expansion of cities, which has left its heritage and culture behind. Day by day new commercial complexes and other buildings are coming up in the place of older buildings. Sometimes historically significant buildings have been demolished to build new structures. This has stirred into an interesting debate on whether the historic buildings should become a prey of modernization or not. Provide your opinion and supporting points.

Answer 1

Historic buildings should be preserved and protected from urban development to maintain cultural and historical value, contribute to a city's uniqueness, and preserve our collective memory.

Step-by-step explanation:

In my opinion, historic buildings should be preserved and protected from urban development as they hold significant cultural and historical value. These buildings are a representation of our past and provide a sense of identity and connection to a community's heritage. By preserving historic buildings, we can ensure that future generations can appreciate and learn from the past.

One supporting point is that historic buildings contribute to the uniqueness and character of a city. They often serve as landmarks and attract tourists, contributing to the local economy. Additionally, historic buildings can be repurposed and renovated to meet the needs of modern society while still preserving their historical significance.

Another important point is that demolishing historic buildings erases a part of our collective memory and culture. Once destroyed, these buildings cannot be replaced. By preserving them, we can maintain a tangible link to the past and foster a sense of pride and identity in our communities.