Final answer:
The statement is false; while intuition and common sense can contribute to understanding human behavior, they are not as reliable or methodologically rigorous as scientific approaches. Intuition often varies by individual and culture, thus lacking the universality and verification of science.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Common sense and intuition are just as good as science when it comes to understanding and predicting human behavior' is false. While intuition and common sense can provide immediate, albeit subjective, insights into human nature and morality, they often lack the empirical support and methodological rigor found in scientific investigation. Concepts such as 'good' and 'bad' can vary across cultures and contexts, illustrating that intuition may not be universally reliable. Moreover, human behavior is complex and can be influenced by a myriad of factors that require systematic analysis to understand fully.
Philosophical discussions on common sense refer to a set of basic facts derived from direct sensibility that are accepted as true. However, these facts are not akin to the clarity and certainty found in mathematical truths like '2 + 2 = 4'. When it comes to predicting human behavior, relying exclusively on intuition and common sense can lead to inaccurate and oversimplified conclusions, as these do not include the systematic verification encountered in scientific methods. In contrast, scientific research uses controlled experiments, statistical analysis, and peer review to achieve more objective and reliable results.