Final answer:
Freedman would respond to Hellman's objection by suggesting a tighter linkage between belief and truth, beyond just avoiding false steps in reasoning, possibly advocating for the reliability of cognitive processes, to tackle the shortcomings of Harman's solution to Gettier problems.
Step-by-step explanation:
Harman's emendation is aimed at addressing certain types of Gettier problems by proposing that for a belief to count as knowledge, it must not be based on any false premises. However, this emendation struggles with cases like the 'fake barn country' scenario, as discussed above, where the belief about a barn, while true, is true merely by luck. To answer the kind of objection raised by Hellman, which points out the shortcomings of Harman's solution in dealing with such cases, Freedman might argue for a more stringent connection between the evidence and the truth of the belief—one that rules out the influence of luck or coincidence and ensures that the belief arises from a reliable process of inference. We might speculate that this would involve emphasizing the reliability of the cognitive processes used in forming the belief, beyond just avoiding falsehoods in reasoning.