64.4k views
5 votes
Which of the following would be considered a foreign person according to FIRPTA?

a) A company incorporated in France with regional development offices in the U.S.
b) A global corporation headquartered in the U.S. with sales offices in six other countries
c) A individual green card holder currently living in the U.S.
d) A real estate investor with dual citizenship in the U.S. and in Canada

User Khalil M
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Under FIRPTA, a foreign person includes non-resident aliens and entities not incorporated in the U.S. Of the provided options, a company incorporated in France with regional development offices in the U.S. would be considered a foreign person.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA) deals with the taxation of foreign persons on the sale of U.S. real property interests. When determining who qualifies as a foreign person under FIRPTA various factors come into play. The options provided describe different business and individual scenarios but according to FIRPTA the definition of a foreign person mainly includes non-resident aliens foreign corporations that have not elected to be treated as domestic corporations, foreign partnerships foreign trusts or foreign estates.

Based on this definition:

  • A company incorporated in France with regional development offices in the U.S. would likely be considered a foreign person under FIRPTA, as its place of incorporation is outside the United States.
  • A global corporation headquartered in the U.S. with sales offices in other countries is not a foreign person since it is headquartered in the U.S.
  • An individual green card holder currently living in the U.S. would not be considered a foreign person under FIRPTA, because green card holders are treated as resident aliens for tax purposes.
  • A real estate investor with dual citizenship in the U.S. and Canada would not be considered a foreign person under FIRPTA for transactions involving U.S. real property interests if they meet the substantial presence test or are otherwise treated as a resident alien for tax purposes.

The scenario that clearly fits the FIRPTA definition of a foreign person is option a company incorporated in France with regional development offices in the U.S.

User Drskullster
by
8.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.