Final answer:
Halstead's software science is not uncontroversial. It has its merits but is criticized for not capturing all aspects of software complexity and for varying opinions on its usefulness.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Halstead's software science is uncontroversial is False. Halstead's software science is a set of metrics used to measure the complexity of software systems. While it has been widely used and has its merits, it is not devoid of controversy.
One of the main criticisms is that the metrics do not adequately capture the diverse factors that contribute to software complexity. For example, Halstead's metrics primarily focus on the structure and syntax of the code, but may not take into account factors like the size of the team or the requirements of the project.
Additionally, different experts may have differing opinions on the usefulness and validity of Halstead's metrics. Some may argue that they provide valuable insights into software development, while others may view them as oversimplified or lacking in practical application.