The key insight is that the powers of 3 and 2 in A and B differ. Therefore, their ratio
will involve terms with non-matching powers, making it unlikely to result in a natural number greater than 1.
To prove that
will never equal a natural number greater than 1 when the sequence contains only natural numbers, consider the expressions for A and B :
![\[ A = -\sum_(n=0)^(len(sequence)-1) 3^(len(sequence)-(n+1)) \cdot 2^{\sum_(i=0)^(n) sequence[i]} \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/college/1pzvh70bpr7t9xtmhjhygp2pr589ecjhl4.png)
![\[ B = 3^(len(sequence)) - 2^{\sum_(i=0)^(len(sequence)-1) sequence[i]} \]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/college/ckh3kijvdcvx7hp88g5onidkh2jg6mioeq.png)
Now, let's observe that A is a sum of terms, each involving
and
.
Meanwhile, B consists of
and
.
The key insight is that the powers of 3 and 2 in A and B differ.
Therefore, their ratio
will involve terms with non-matching powers, making it unlikely to result in a natural number greater than 1.
This is because the exponents in the numerator and denominator do not align in a way that would yield a simple natural number.
The probable question may be:
You have to prove that when a sequence contains only natural numbers, A divided by B will never equal a natural number greater than 1. The formulas for A and B are in the file below. An example is shown below.
A=-(\sum^{len(sequence)-1}_{n=0} )3^{len(sequence)-(n+1)} * 2^{sum(sequence[0:n])})\\\\
B= 3^{len(sequence)}-2^{sum(sequence)}
Sequence = [1, 3, 2, 1] (There is no limit to the length of the sequence)
A =3^(3) * 2^(0) = 27
3^(2) * 2^(1) = 18
3^(1) * 2^(4) = 48
3^(0) * 2^(6) = 64
27+18+48+64 = 157
157 * -1 = -157
A = -157
B =3^(4) - 2^(7) = -47
B = -47
-157 divided by -47 is not a natural number greater than 1