155k views
7 votes
Which best describes the March to the Sea? It was a tactic that ultimately wasted Northern resources. It was a destructive tactic that made the war last longer. It was a destructive tactic that helped end the war. It was a tactic that showed the North’s good intentions.

User Emre Colak
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

It was a destructive tactic that helped end the war.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since they marched and destroyed everything in their path, forcing the enemy to surrender.

User Gaurav Gharat
by
8.6k points

Related questions

asked Jun 7, 2023 71.9k views
Rounak asked Jun 7, 2023
by Rounak
8.4k points
2 answers
13 votes
71.9k views