155k views
7 votes
Which best describes the March to the Sea? It was a tactic that ultimately wasted Northern resources. It was a destructive tactic that made the war last longer. It was a destructive tactic that helped end the war. It was a tactic that showed the North’s good intentions.

User Emre Colak
by
3.4k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

It was a destructive tactic that helped end the war.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since they marched and destroyed everything in their path, forcing the enemy to surrender.

User Gaurav Gharat
by
3.8k points