37.9k views
4 votes
If one were to compare the monopolistically competitive firm's long run outcome to that of a perfectly competitive one, one would conclude that the monopolistically competitive firm:

a. creates more total surplus.
b. produces less.
c. charges less.
d. earns greater profits.

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

A monopolistically competitive firm produces less and charges a higher price in the long run compared to a perfectly competitive firm, leading to allocative inefficiency and resulting in zero economic profits due to market entry and exit responses.

Step-by-step explanation:

When comparing the long-run outcomes of a monopolistically competitive firm to that of a perfectly competitive firm, one would conclude that the monopolistically competitive firm produces less. In perfectly competitive markets, firms produce at a quantity where price equals marginal cost, which allows for allocative efficiency, meaning the social benefits equal the marginal costs.

However, in monopolistic competition, firms maximize profit by setting MR = MC, leading to a higher price than marginal revenue due to a downward sloping demand curve. As a result, monopolistically competitive firms charge a higher price and produce a lower quantity compared to perfectly competitive firms, generating allocative inefficiency. Long-run equilibrium in monopolistically competitive markets leads to zero economic profits due to the entry and exit of firms responding to profit opportunities.

User Waxen
by
8.6k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.