Final answer:
Sandel argues that the government must attempt to find neutral principles of justice, even if such attempts are challenging.
Step-by-step explanation:
Sandel argues that the government must attempt to find neutral principles of justice, even if such attempts are challenging. This means that the government should strive to make decisions and policies that are fair and impartial, without favoring any particular group or individual. Sandel believes that finding neutral principles of justice is crucial for creating a just society.
For example, if the government is deciding on a policy regarding income distribution, it should aim to create a system that treats everyone equally and ensures that resources are distributed fairly. This can be challenging because different people may have different perspectives on what is fair and just.
However, Sandel argues that even though it may be difficult, the government should still actively strive to find neutral principles of justice in order to create a society that is fair and just for all its citizens.
Michael Sandel, a political philosopher, indeed argues that governments must attempt to find neutral principles of justice, which is indicative of a search for moral authority that is not tied to any particular viewpoint or social position. In this context, the term “neutral principles” suggests a foundation for justice that can be accepted by all, regardless of individual beliefs. Sandel believes that even though the task is challenging, it is critical for a government's legitimacy and its ability to provide justice that is seen as fair and impartial. This aligns with the ideas of other philosophers like Plato, who espoused a ruler guided by reason and justice, and John Rawls, who aimed to define principles of fairness that harmonize human freedom with social welfare.