Question

How did the Babylonian system of law differ from the Hittites' system of law?

Option 1: Babylonian law was primarily oral, while Hittite law was written.
Option 2: Babylonian law emphasized communal decisions, while Hittite law relied on royal decrees.
Option 3: Babylonian law had more severe punishments, while Hittite law focused on restitution.
Option 4: Babylonian law applied only to nobility, while Hittite law applied to all citizens.

Answer 1

The Babylonian system of law differed from the Hittites' system of law in terms of oral vs. written law, severity of punishments, and applicability to different social classes.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Babylonian system of law differed from the Hittites' system of law in several ways:

1. Babylonian law was primarily oral, while Hittite law was written. The Code of Hammurabi, the most substantial surviving law code from Babylon, was written on stone pillars. On the other hand, Hittite laws were written on clay tablets.
2. Babylonian law had more severe punishments, while Hittite law focused on restitution. The Code of Hammurabi included punishments such as death or disfigurement for certain crimes, while Hittite laws focused more on compensating the victim rather than inflicting punishment.
3. Babylonian law applied only to nobility, while Hittite law applied to all citizens. In Babylon, there were legal distinctions between aristocratic citizens, commoners, and slaves. However, Hittite law applied to all members of society.