Final Answer:
Mrs. Clare's personal connection to the victims explains her expected lack of surprise. Emotional responses to tragic events are often influenced by the proximity of the relationship, and in this case, her familial ties justify her reaction. Thus the correct option is b) No, it's not surprising because she was related to the victims.
Step-by-step explanation:
Mrs. Clare's lack of surprise at the news of the murders is rooted in her personal connection to the victims. As family often plays a crucial role in emotional reactions, it's expected that her response would differ from someone with no connection to the victims. Understanding the context of the relationship is vital in evaluating the appropriateness of her attitude.
In cases where individuals are directly related to the victims, their emotional responses are often more intense and less surprising. Emotional ties can evoke a range of reactions, from deep sorrow to shock, influencing the perception of the event. Mrs. Clare's lack of surprise, given her familial connection, aligns with the anticipated emotional impact on someone with personal ties to the victims.
In conclusion, the absence of surprise in Mrs. Clare's attitude can be attributed to her familial relationship with the victims. Emotional reactions are subjective and context-dependent, and in this scenario, her response aligns with what one might expect from someone directly connected to the individuals affected by the tragic event.
Therefore, the correct option is b) No, it's not surprising because she was related to the victims.