114k views
1 vote
You need a separate operator for const and non-const operators.

a) True
b) False

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

In C++, a separate operator is required for const and non-const operators. This allows for different behavior based on the constness of the object.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement is true. In C++, a separate operator is required for const and non-const operators. This is because const operators operate on const objects and non-const operators operate on non-const objects. Having separate operators allows for different behavior to be implemented based on the constness of the object.

For example, if we have a class named MyClass, we can define a const operator[] and a non-const operator[]. The const operator[] would return a const reference to an element of the object, while the non-const operator[] would return a non-const reference. This allows us to modify the object through the non-const operator[], but not through the const operator[].

Keywords: C++, separate operators, const, non-const, behavior

User Sidgate
by
9.5k points