Question

What are some of the differences between the way each of these characters talks about the concept of science? (Compare how it seems they feel about what they are doing, who their intended audience is, what is the reason behind what they're doing, etc.)

Answer 1

Characters discussing science may differ in their approach based on their feelings towards science, their intended audience, and their reasons for engaging in scientific research, reflecting either basic or applied science goals.

Step-by-step explanation:

The differences between characters in the way they talk about the concept of science can be analyzed through several lenses. These characters might have different feelings towards science, deal with different audiences, and have varied reasons behind their scientific endeavors. For instance, one scientist might engage in basic science, driven by curiosity and a desire to expand knowledge, while another is focused on applied science to solve practical problems. The way they articulate these purposes will differ; the former may use complex terminology suited for academic peers, while the latter may employ more accessible language to reach a broader audience. These differences are also reflective of the scientific method, where hypotheses and experimental results need to be tailored to the expected recipients. Moreover, characters engaged in science must consider the broader implications of their work, such as ethical considerations and the misuse of science, which are critical components of scientific inquiry as described in the chapter.