Final answer:
Critically evaluating all information, including analyzing the bias of sources and distinguishing between primary and secondary sources, is key when dealing with contradicting reports of an event.
Step-by-step explanation:
When confronted with contradicting reports of a single event from different sources, it is important to engage in critical evaluation of all the information available. This involves analyzing the bias of the sources, which can manifest as a selection of sources that support a certain view over another.
Further, it involves distinguishing between primary and secondary sources, verifying the credibility of the writers, and understanding the context in which the information was produced. When a reporter uses experts in a story, it's essential to examine the experts' affiliations and political perspectives to ensure a balanced view.
Lastly, it is important not to disregard contradictory reports but rather to thoroughly compare and corroborate them to understand the perspective they are coming from and their significance to the event. This comprehensive approach ensures a more objective and accurate understanding of the event, countering any inherent biases.