56.8k views
3 votes
High school students should not begin the school day until 9 A.M. Teenagers' brains do not work well early in the morning. Starting school later would make students better able to learn. True, a later start time would be a problem for sports teams. But schools are not primarily for athletics; they are for learning.

Which of the following would be considered the counterargument statement?

a) High school students should not begin the school day until 9 A.M.
b) Teenagers' brains do not work well early in the morning.
c) Starting school later would make students better able to learn.
d) True, a later start time would be a problem for sports teams.

User Cdmt
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The counterargument statement in the discussion about school start times is that a later start time would be problematic for sports teams.

Step-by-step explanation:

The counterargument statement in the provided text is: d) True, a later start time would be a problem for sports teams. This statement acknowledges a potential negative consequence of implementing a later school start time, which counterbalances the argument that delaying the start of the school day to 9 A.M. will benefit students' learning abilities.

User Amre
by
8.7k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.