56.8k views
3 votes
High school students should not begin the school day until 9 A.M. Teenagers' brains do not work well early in the morning. Starting school later would make students better able to learn. True, a later start time would be a problem for sports teams. But schools are not primarily for athletics; they are for learning.

Which of the following would be considered the counterargument statement?

a) High school students should not begin the school day until 9 A.M.
b) Teenagers' brains do not work well early in the morning.
c) Starting school later would make students better able to learn.
d) True, a later start time would be a problem for sports teams.

User Cdmt
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The counterargument statement in the discussion about school start times is that a later start time would be problematic for sports teams.

Step-by-step explanation:

The counterargument statement in the provided text is: d) True, a later start time would be a problem for sports teams. This statement acknowledges a potential negative consequence of implementing a later school start time, which counterbalances the argument that delaying the start of the school day to 9 A.M. will benefit students' learning abilities.

User Amre
by
8.8k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.