Final answer:
The correct statement regarding the traditional peer-review process is that reviewers are usually anonymous. The process is not quick nor informal, and authors have a role in addressing the reviewers' feedback.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct option regarding the traditional peer-review process is b) Reviewers are usually anonymous.
In the traditional peer-review process, reviewers are typically anonymous, meaning that the author of the article being reviewed does not know who is reviewing their work, and the reviewers do not know the author's identity. This anonymity helps to ensure an unbiased evaluation of the article's quality and prevents any potential biases or conflicts of interest.
Additionally, the peer-review process is not quick and informal - it is a rigorous and structured evaluation that involves experts in the field examining the research methodology, results, and conclusions of the article. Authors also play a crucial role in the process by addressing the feedback and suggestions given by the reviewers.