223k views
1 vote
The management at Gomars Inc., a firm manufacturing toys, is involved in a dispute with the union members representing its employees. The union members want a pay hike, but the management is not ready to approve the hike. Failing to arrive at a compromise, the disputing parties involve a third party to resolve the issue and offer a solution that is legally binding. The third party in the given scenario best represents a(n):

Select one:
a. conciliator.
b. arbitrator.
c. mediator.
d. strikebreaker.
e. scab.

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The third party in the described scenario who offers a legally binding solution to the dispute over a pay hike between Gomars Inc. and its employees' union is best represented as an arbitrator. An arbitrator has the authority to make a decision that both parties must follow, unlike mediators or conciliators.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the scenario described, where Gomars Inc. is facing a dispute with its employees' union over a pay hike and a third party is involved to resolve the issue with a legally binding solution, the third party best represents an arbitrator. An arbitrator is a neutral third party who listens to both sides in a dispute and makes a decision that is binding for all involved parties.

In cases where an informal approach hasn't worked and no internal mechanism is available, an arbitrator can offer a fair resolution, such as in historical events like the 1902 Anthracite Coal Strike where miners eventually received a 10 percent raise through arbitration. Employers and unions may resort to arbitration when negotiations reach a standstill to ensure that the dispute does not escalate further and disrupt work processes.

User Andres Jaan Tack
by
7.2k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.