Final answer:
Truman Capote shows opposition to the death penalty in Part IV through criticisms of its arbitrary application, highlighting wrongful executions, legislative debates to end it, and flaws in legal representation, suggesting his critical stance on the issue.
Step-by-step explanation:
Part IV of Truman Capote's book displays an implicit opposition to the death penalty through various details and criticisms of its application. The references to past cases, such as Furman v. Georgia and Kennedy v. Louisiana, highlight the arbitrary and, at times, unconstitutional nature of capital punishment. Furthermore, the book discusses instances where individuals were wrongfully executed, which underscores the potential irreversible consequences of the death penalty.
The mention of Representative Henry González's repeated proposals to abolish the death penalty points to a persistent debate and opposition within the legislative context. Lastly, the mention of the Scottsboro case, where poor legal representation and discriminated juries led to a contention of the sentencing, shows Capote's interest in the flawed legal system and its impact on the imposition of the death penalty. Altogether, these details suggest Capote's critical view of capital punishment and an undercurrent of opposition to its continuation.