Question

What conclusion about the nature of audience support is justified by the results of Experiment 2 alone?

A.Supportive friends can disrupt a performance if they would benefit from its success.

B.Supportive strangers can enhance a performance if they would not benefit from its success.

C.Strangers can disrupt a performance if they would benefit from its success.

D.Strangers can disrupt a performance if its success would benefit the performer.

Answer 1

Without detailed information on Experiment 2, it's challenging to determine which conclusion about the nature of audience support is justified; audience support, especially from friends, has been shown to lead to better performance under stress.

Step-by-step explanation:

The nature of audience support and its impact on performance is a complex subject that can vary depending on the context and the individuals involved. Based on the provided information, Experiment 2 specifically demonstrates that social support from a friend, who might not directly benefit from the performer's success, leads to better performance outcomes such as lower blood pressure during stressful tasks. Therefore, none of the options A through D directly correspond to the findings in Experiment 2. To accurately determine which conclusion is justified by the results of Experiment 2 alone, we would need more detailed information about the experiment's design and results. Unfortunately, without that information, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer to the question of what conclusion about the nature of audience support is justified by the results of Experiment 2 alone.