Final answer:
If the UN could enforce laws internationally, it would weaken Velasquez's argument that businesses are not obligated to contribute to the international common good, as enforcement would necessitate compliance with international standards promoting common good. It is true that if an entity like the UN actually had the power to enforce laws at an international level, it would weaken the argument that Velasquez makes about businesses not being obligated to contribute to the international common good.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is true that if an entity like the UN actually had the power to enforce laws at an international level, it would weaken the argument that Velasquez makes about businesses not being obligated to contribute to the international common good. Currently, the sovereignty of member states within the UN and the lack of a true enforcement body means that businesses are not compelled by international law to act for the common good. The anarchic nature of the international system often leads to the phenomenon of free riding, where states benefit from common goods without contributing towards securing them.
However, if international enforcement were possible, with the UN having the power to apply and enforce laws across borders, it would create a unified standard that businesses would need to follow which could include contributing to the international common good. As such, with stronger global governance and enforcement capabilities, the UN could mandate behaviors that support the international community, including actions by businesses that extend beyond individual state interests.