Final answer:
The statement that competition is the best way to encourage the public school system to improve, a view supported by school-choice advocates, is true. Supporters believe competition can lead to better educational outcomes, but findings are mixed, and the effectiveness of school choice in improving education varies.
Step-by-step explanation:
Supporters of the school-choice movement argue that competition is the best way to encourage the public school system to improve education is true. School choice, including vouchers and charter schools, introduces competition into the education system, which purportedly leads to improvements in schooling options for families. The idea is that when schools compete for students, they strive to offer a better educational experience to attract and retain students. This could lead to innovation, improved teaching methods, and ultimately, better student outcomes. However, it's important to understand that the effectiveness of school choice and competition in education has mixed empirical support. Some studies suggest additional school options can improve educational outcomes. Nevertheless, the value of private providers relative to public schools is uncertain, with concerns such as increased costs, variable quality, equity issues, and potential for increased racial segregation. Moreover, a broader range of factors, including policy design and the organization and management of schools, contributes to educational success, beyond just resources or competition.