Question

They were quite autonomous in their decisions and did not depend on the central power, so the latter did not interfere in the internal affairs of tribes and clans. What was the relationship between the tribes/clans and the central power?

1) The tribes/clans were subordinate to the central power
2) The tribes/clans were independent of the central power
3) The tribes/clans were controlled by the central power
4) The tribes/clans were in conflict with the central power

Answer 1

Tribes/clans were independent of the central power, maintaining autonomy in their internal affairs without interference from the central authority.

Step-by-step explanation:

The relationship between tribes/clans and central power was such that the tribes/clans were largely independent of the central power. They were autonomous in their decisions, and the central authority did not interfere with their internal affairs, allowing them to manage their own resources, engage in their own conflicts, and drift in and out of larger tribal confederations as their needs dictated. This level of autonomy suggests that the tribes/clans were not subordinate to, controlled by, or consistently in conflict with central power, but rather operated independently alongside it.