150k views
0 votes
An internal audit team is performing a due diligence audit to assess plans for a potential merger/acquisition. Which of the following would be the least valid reason for a company to merge with or acquire another company?

A. To increase stock prices.
B. To reduce labor costs.
C. To respond to government policy.
D. To diversify risk.

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The correct answer is option A. To increase stock prices.

Step-by-step explanation:

The least valid reason for a company to merge with or acquire another company among the options provided would be 'To increase stock prices.' While enhancing stock prices might be a byproduct of a merger or acquisition, it is not typically the primary motive. Significant reasons for mergers and acquisitions include becoming more efficient, acquiring a new product line, or reducing competition, and can also align with responding to governmental policies that might affect the industry. In contrast, stock prices are influenced by a wide array of factors and are more of a reflection of the market's perception of the company's value post-merger or acquisition.

Mergers and acquisitions often lead to a reduction in labor costs through the elimination of duplicate services within the two combined companies. Responding to government policy can also be a valid reason if, for example, new regulations make the merger beneficial or necessary for survival.

Diversifying risk could be another sound strategic reason, as it can create a more resilient organization by spreading out exposure to different markets or products.

User Trees
by
7.6k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.