Final answer:
The statement is true.The Federalist Papers were a series of essays written to support the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, advocating for a strong central government and explaining the checks and balances system would prevent tyranny. They responded to the anti-Federalist writings that opposed a centralized power and demanded protections like a Bill of Rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Federalist Papers were indeed a response to anti-Federalist sentiment, which makes this statement true. These papers were a series of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pseudonym Publius, advocating for the ratification of the United States Constitution. They were written to convince the public of the necessity of a strong central government and to ease concerns about the potential for tyranny through the checks and balances system.
The Anti-Federalists voiced their opposition through various writings, arguing that a strong central government could become oppressive and advocating for a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties. While these writers were not a small, unified group, their essays and concerns played an important role in shaping the final Constitution.
One of the reasons behind the writing of The Federalist Papers was to encourage New York's ratification of the Constitution (B), emphasizing the need for a unified nation capable of effectively managing both domestic issues and foreign affairs.