222k views
4 votes
Here is a procedure of inference, but some of the steps and reasons are not listed.Step Reason(1) P ∨ Q Premise (2) ? Transformation (1) (3) P → R Premise (4) ¬Q → R ? (2)(3) (5) ? Transformation (4) (6) Q → S Premise (7) ¬Q ∨ S Transformation (6) (8) S ∨ R ? (5)(7)

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The given argument is a valid deductive inference known as modus ponens.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this argument, we can see that the given premises and conclusions are:

  1. P > Q
  2. Q
  3. P

Based on these premises, we can conclude that P is true. This is a valid deductive inference known as modus ponens, where if a conditional statement is true and its antecedent is true, then the consequent must also be true.

User Paulino III
by
8.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories