Final answer:
The given argument is a valid deductive inference known as modus ponens.
Step-by-step explanation:
In this argument, we can see that the given premises and conclusions are:
- P > Q
- Q
- P
Based on these premises, we can conclude that P is true. This is a valid deductive inference known as modus ponens, where if a conditional statement is true and its antecedent is true, then the consequent must also be true.