106k views
0 votes
What do you think about Ferguson and Lohmann's response to the question of what is to be done?

a) They propose concrete solutions
b) They are pessimistic and offer no solutions
c) They emphasize the importance of more development interventions
d) Their response is unclear and ambiguous

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Ferguson and Lohmann propose addressing root causes of migration via peace negotiations and rebuilding efforts, reflecting broader development economy theories focusing on alternative solutions to traditional aid, such as trade and private investment as suggested by Moyo. While local participatory research can tailor effective solutions, the implementation of these solutions faces challenges like local perceptions, coordination, and policy enactment.

Step-by-step explanation:

Understanding Ferguson and Lohmann's Response

When considering Ferguson and Lohmann's response to the question of what is to be done, it's important to evaluate their proposed solutions within the context of development economics and humanitarian aid. Their approach seems to align with the belief in addressing the root causes that force people to flee their countries, such as fostering peace negotiations, providing material support in times of crisis, and aiding in the reconstruction of stable governance. This aligns with the solution offered in the context of the challenges of foreign aid, where increased trade, private investment, and alternative financing options, as suggested by economists like Dambisa Moyo, are seen as more effective than traditional aid that often gets misused.

Solutions to the problems of policy and inequality have been proposed historically with a focus on social ownership or governmental reform, reflecting a variety of philosophical and economic approaches. Yet, a common trait among many proposals, such as those in the early 19th century, is the consideration of social ownership of the means of production. The complexities in the effectiveness of these solutions often boil down to implementation, corruption, and the intricacies of international relations and domestic capacities.

Research in communities that emphasizes participation and action suggests a path toward effective solutions and reflects a strength in developing interventions most attuned to local concerns and needs. Nevertheless, there are limits: such as whether the local population identifies a particular issue as a problem, the potential for inconsistent coordination amongst aid efforts, and the challenges in translating research findings into actionable policies.

User Krrish
by
8.3k points