Final answer:
The strategy of delaying a conflict for later consideration and negotiation is known as Deferred Conflict. It allows for time to think and often leads to a compromise when parties generally agree on goals but differ in specifics.
Step-by-step explanation:
The strategy that involves putting off the majority of the conflict until later, which allows parties time to think the issue over and potentially agree on a smaller part of the problem, is known as Deferred Conflict. This approach can be particularly useful in the context of collective decision-making where there is a bias toward maintaining the status quo, or during bargaining in political contexts where parties may need additional time to assess and negotiate the circumstances of a conflict. Compromise is another important concept in collective decision-making, and it usually comes into play when parties have a general agreement on the goals, but differ in their preferred approaches or specific details. In practice, this can look like countries negotiating on the percentage by which to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, where they agree on the overall goal but need to find a middle ground on the specifics.