Final answer:
The statement that animals and the environment cannot be considered stakeholders is false; they are indeed considered in many decision-making processes due to their direct impacts from human activities.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that animals and the environment cannot be considered a stakeholder since they do not have a voice is false. Stakeholders include all those who are affected by or have an interest in a particular issue, and this can extend beyond humans to include animals and ecosystems. Even though animals and the environment do not communicate in the same way humans do, their well-being and the impact human activities have on them are considered by many organizations and governments in their decision-making processes. For example, environmental impact assessments involve studying how a proposed project might affect the local flora and fauna, acknowledging them as stakeholders implicitly.
Regarding the historical context of the 19th Amendment, it is true that prior to its ratification, women lacked many rights that acknowledged them as independent legal persons.
In the context of biodiversity, an island ecosystem assessment would likely include analyzing various factors such as the presence of unique or endangered species, the richness of species, and their interdependence.