209k views
4 votes
Because none of the notes strength, do you think I have the theft? May have to figure out the theft of the document behind, but it wouldn't have been difficult for Anil to match the events that should have taken place.

A) True
B) False

User Espo
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The text describes a clever document theft by Minister D in a political scenario, highlighting the importance of not only stealing the document but also maintaining immediate access to it for potential use or destruction.

Step-by-step explanation:

The passage you’ve provided appears to be from a detective or mystery novel, likely involving a scenario where a valuable document has been stolen. The text describes a cunning theft carried out by Minister D, who utilizes a moment of distraction to replace the important letter with a less significant one. The act is done in such a way that the rightful owner of the letter cannot openly accuse the thief without exposing themselves to a political risk.

The minister chose not to hide the document in a location separate from his person due to the need for the document to be quickly produced or destroyed, indicating that the letter was likely kept close at hand. This suggests that the minister is involved in sensitive political machinations where immediate access to the letter's contents could be critical.

Dupin's analysis reveals that it is not only the possession of the letter that is important but also its availability for quick use, which could mean the difference between political gain or disaster.

User Fabrice Le Fessant
by
7.9k points