135k views
23 votes
While exploring a rock formation, Hiroto finds a rock that has footprints pressed into it. A geologist tells Hiroto that the rock is millions of years old. Which of these claims

is correct about Hiroto's find?
It is not a fossil because footprints are not fossils.
It is not a fossil because only whole organisms are fossils.
It is a fossil only if Hiroto finds actual parts of the organism in rocks nearby.
It is a fossil because footprints of organisms from million of years ago are considered to
be fosss

User Amcc
by
7.3k points

2 Answers

7 votes

Answer:

message me on ig

Step-by-step explanation:

she.hatezay ill help you there

User Gnat
by
6.0k points
7 votes

Answer:

5 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

User Brian Hamill
by
7.7k points