Question

While exploring a rock formation, Hiroto finds a rock that has footprints pressed into it. A geologist tells Hiroto that the rock is millions of years old. Which of these claims

is correct about Hiroto's find?
It is not a fossil because footprints are not fossils.
It is not a fossil because only whole organisms are fossils.
It is a fossil only if Hiroto finds actual parts of the organism in rocks nearby.
It is a fossil because footprints of organisms from million of years ago are considered to
be fosss

Answer 1

message me on ig

Step-by-step explanation:

she.hatezay ill help you there

Answer 2

5 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation: