138k views
3 votes
Which of the following is not a reason for the popularity of trial-and-error over Linear Programming for Aggregate planning?

a. Trial-and-error is quicker to solve.
b. Trial-and-error is easier to model on
c. Linear Programming is less flexible
d. All of the above

User Mmocny
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The popularity of trial-and-error over Linear Programming for Aggregate planning is not due to trial-and-error being quicker to solve or easier to model, but it is more flexible.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is c. Both a and b. Trial-and-error is not the preferred method for aggregate planning because it is quicker to solve or easier to model, but because it is more flexible compared to Linear Programming. Trial-and-error allows planners to quickly adjust their decisions based on feedback and make changes as necessary, unlike Linear Programming which requires precise mathematical calculations.

User Danilonet
by
7.9k points