138k views
3 votes
Which of the following is not a reason for the popularity of trial-and-error over Linear Programming for Aggregate planning?

a. Trial-and-error is quicker to solve.
b. Trial-and-error is easier to model on
c. Linear Programming is less flexible
d. All of the above

User Mmocny
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The popularity of trial-and-error over Linear Programming for Aggregate planning is not due to trial-and-error being quicker to solve or easier to model, but it is more flexible.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is c. Both a and b. Trial-and-error is not the preferred method for aggregate planning because it is quicker to solve or easier to model, but because it is more flexible compared to Linear Programming. Trial-and-error allows planners to quickly adjust their decisions based on feedback and make changes as necessary, unlike Linear Programming which requires precise mathematical calculations.

User Danilonet
by
7.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.