Final answer:
Haig Khatchadourian's argument that terrorism violates individual autonomy is true. Terrorism restricts individuals' freedom by imposing political or ideological views through violence and intimidation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Haig Khatchadourian, in his work on ethics and the philosophy of violence, indeed argues that terrorism violates the autonomy of individuals. This assertion is true because terrorism, by its very nature, involves the use of violence and intimidation to enforce one's political or ideological views upon others against their will. Such acts clearly undermine the autonomy of the affected individuals, as their ability to make free and informed choices is forcibly taken from them.
In a broader sense, when considering Proudhon's perspective on government and human dignity, there is a parallel notion that the imposition of power, either by governmental control or terrorist acts, is inherently against the dignity of individuals. Terrorism, much like the overreach of government power, involves exerting force and controlling individuals in ways that strip them of their intrinsic right to self-governance.
Reflecting upon historical events, such as the French terrorist attacks in 1995, illustrates the real-world impacts of terrorism on the autonomy of individuals and society at large. The aftermath often leads to increased government surveillance and security measures, which can also raise concerns regarding the balance between ensuring safety and preserving civil liberties. Thus, Khatchadourian's view that terrorism violates individual autonomy aligns with the concern for human rights and the preservation of individual dignity against unlawful coercion.