111k views
1 vote
Furio is majoring in early childhood education and is currently on internship. When he is at school, Furio follows his professor's suggestion to keep anecdotal records. Furio has found that he doesn't have time to do this during the day, but he does manage to make observations at the end of the day. After three weeks, Furio notices that he has no notes on a child named Caleb. What does this suggest?

A. Furio is not very good at observation and self-reflection.
B. Caleb is well-behaved and, therefore, doesn't garner much attention.
C. Caleb is shy, and Furio should help him "come out of his shell."
D. Furio has not been noticing Caleb and needs to make more of an effort to pay attention to him

User RickJansen
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Furio's lack of anecdotal records for Caleb suggests that Furio needs to make an effort to observe all children, ensuring no one is overlooked. The correct option is D, indicating Furio should pay more attention to Caleb.

Step-by-step explanation:

Furio's situation of not having any anecdotal records on a child named Caleb during his early childhood education internship suggests that he might not have been paying sufficient attention to all the children under his care.

In practical settings like a classroom, it's important for educators and interns to observe behavior and interaction of all children, which enables them to support each child's development effectively.

Furio's omission doesn't immediately indicate that Caleb is well-behaved, shy, or that Furio lacks skills in observation and self-reflection. Instead, it highlights the need for Furio to make a more concerted effort to include all children in his observations, ensuring that no child, such as Caleb, is overlooked.

The correct option in this scenario is D: Furio has not been noticing Caleb and needs to make more of an effort to pay attention to him.

User Adam Weitzman
by
8.0k points