Final answer:
Characters in traditional literature are typically depicted as either good or bad, with realist literature favoring more complex, nuanced character portrayals. Naturalistic literature often presents characters as victims of environment and genetics with little free will.
Step-by-step explanation:
Characters in traditional literature are typically easily identifiable as good or bad. This is in contrast to Realist literature, which features characters that are more three-dimensional and complex, reflecting the subtleties of real people who might not be all good or all bad. Characters in Realist stories are often depicted as middle class, facing real-life struggles within ordinary circumstances without neat resolutions. This characterization approach rejected Romantic features of emotionalism and idealism, focusing instead on detailed descriptions and genuine, plausible character development. On the other hand, Naturalistic literature portrays characters as subject to their environment and hereditary traits, often unable to exercise free will and trapped by circumstances, which is a departure from characters of noble birth or comedic archetypes.