Final answer:
Critical philosophy rejects ethnophilosophy because it prioritizes universal philosophical concepts over context-dependent ones and aims to critique and revise cultural presuppositions. Ethnophilosophy's cultural specificity and potential relativism contrast with critical philosophy's goal to engage with global ideas and seek universal truths.
Step-by-step explanation:
Critical philosophy often rejects ethnophilosophy because it evaluates philosophy through a rigorous lens that emphasizes universal, foundational tenets applicable across various contexts and cultures. Ethnophilosophy, which embeds philosophy within the cultural traditions and narratives of specific ethnic groups, is seen by critical philosophers as context-dependent and lacking in objective philosophical rigor. The historical and cultural specificity of ethnophilosophy is viewed as a potential obstacle to the development of universally applicable philosophical arguments.
Moreover, the critical theory branch of philosophy advocates for a reflective and transformative approach towards traditional philosophical paradigms, pushing for a critique of systems of power and oppression that could be perpetuated within ethnophilosophical constructs. This aligns with the broader postmodern skepticism towards meta-narratives and longstanding philosophical traditions. Critical philosophy aims to interrogate and revise, rather than accept uncritically, the presuppositions and methodologies inherited through culture, including those embedded in ethnophilosophy.
Furthermore, critical philosophy often strives for dialogue and engagement with global philosophical ideas, demarcating itself from what it perceives as the relativism that can arise within ethnophilosophical frameworks. This pursuit calls for an ahistorical understanding that transcends individual cultural or ethnic philosophies and instead seeks to uncover universal truths.