Final answer:
This philosophical discussion delves into the concept of freedom and how it relates to self-definition, referencing existentialist viewpoints and exploring the extent to which human beings are free to make choices.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question revolves around the concept of freedom and self-definition referencing existentialist views and the philosophical discussion of liberty and determination. Existential thoughts by Nietzsche suggest that human beings are free to become whatever they project and are condemned to be free. This implies that human beings can make choices and that these choices define their essence. The concept of personal liberty is also touched upon, explaining that individuals have the freedom to make choices about their personal life without unwarranted external interference.
An example given is the experience of identifying with a gender different from one's biological sex and the choice to undergo changes to align one's physical appearance with that gender identity. This illustrates the existentialist idea that essence does not precede existence; rather, existence precedes essence. We are substantively what we choose to be. However, the notion of freedom is nuanced, acknowledging that choices and actions can have repercussions, and freedom does not equate to an absence of consequences or accountability for those choices.
The passages provided also consider the concept of being forced by external or internal agents and whether true freedom exists if our choices are influenced or determined by these forces. Thus, the discussion threads through questions of free will, self-determination, and the nature of expression within the constraints of physical and social realities.