Final answer:
Land tenure in Kenya has been influenced by ethnic and political tensions, whereas Tanzania has set precedents in recognizing indigenous people's land rights, such as the Hadza's land claim. Horticultural societies in Tanzania maintain land usage rights without private ownership, while in Kenya, land tenure varies among ethnic groups.
Step-by-step explanation:
Differences in Land Tenure Between Kenya and Tanzania
The concept of land tenure refers to the way in which land is owned and managed. In Kenya, issues relating to land tenure have been influenced by ethnic tensions and political conflicts. For instance, the Kenyan leader Jomo Kenyatta favored his Kikuyu people during his presidency, which led to political realignments and violence following a contested election in 2008. In contrast, Tanzania has managed to reconstitute land rights in a way that recognizes indigenous people's claims. The Hadza people's successful claim to 57,000 hectares of land is a notable example of this. The granting of land title to the Hadza marks an important precedent in acknowledging the rights of gathering-hunting peoples within the country.
Both Kenya and Tanzania face challenges regarding land tenure and/or ownership, livelihood security, and the right to be involved in the governance of land and resources. However, their approaches and historical circumstances have led to differences in policy and practice that bear upon their social and political landscapes differently.