Final answer:
An objective statement need not be true as objectivity relates to bias-free statements, whereas truth requires corresponding with actual facts. Aristotle posits that a statement is true if it accurately describes what is. Philosophical debates offer various perspectives on understanding and defining truth.
Step-by-step explanation:
A statement's objectivity is not contingent upon its truth; objectivity pertains to statements made without personal bias or emotions, whereas truth is a property of a statement that accurately reflects reality or facts. For instance, when someone jests "Dad just got home" without that being the case, it is not an objective statement of reality. Similarly, "He told you to take the trash out" as a deliberate lie does not convey truth. However, from a philosophical standpoint, objectivity and truth are distinct concepts; a statement can be objective (uninfluenced by personal feelings) but not true.
Aristotle's understanding of truth asserts that a statement is true if it aligns with reality "A is B" is true if A indeed is B. This Correspondence Theory of Truth requires a relation between the statement and the factual state of affairs in the world. Meanwhile, discussions about truth may also venture into perspectives like Pragmatism (truth as what satisfies verification within a community) and Logical Empiricism (truth based on a verification process).