Final answer:
Comparative credence in philosophy involves evaluating and comparing different beliefs or viewpoints based on their plausibility.
Step-by-step explanation:
Comparative credence refers to a concept in philosophy that deals with the evaluation and comparison of different beliefs or viewpoints based on their plausibility or likelihood of being true. It involves assessing various perspectives and their trade-offs to determine their rationality and justification.
For example, in evaluating different ethical theories, philosophers may compare the merits of consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics based on their practical implications and logical coherence.
One approach to comparative credence in philosophy is normative ethical relativism, which asserts that ethical principles are relative to individual or cultural perspectives. However, normative ethical relativism is not without its shortcomings. Alternatively, philosophers often seek a basis for moral rule-making through reason and universally applicable principles, regardless of cultural or individual perspectives.
Perfectionism is another concept related to comparative credence in philosophy. It involves striving for the development of human excellence and the realization of one's potential. Perfectionism aims to identify and pursue virtues or qualities that contribute to individual and societal well-being.