127k views
3 votes
What difference does the different normalization make with respect to the calculation of long-term evolutionary dynamics in the most simple models?

In particular: While relative fitness 2 can be held constant over generations because it does not depend on the (changing) relative frequencies of the given types, relative fitness 1 depends on the (changing) relative frequencies of the given types and therefore cannot be held constant over generations - is this correct?

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Different normalization in the calculation of long-term evolutionary dynamics considers relative fitness. Relative fitness 2 can be held constant over generations, while relative fitness 1 depends on changing relative frequencies and cannot be held constant.

Step-by-step explanation:

The different normalization in the calculation of long-term evolutionary dynamics refers to the consideration of relative fitness. In simple models, relative fitness 2 can be held constant over generations because it does not depend on the changing relative frequencies of the given types. On the other hand, relative fitness 1 depends on the changing relative frequencies and therefore cannot be held constant.

User Mithuna
by
8.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.